Thursday, October 04, 2012
T.S. Eliot -
Sunday, September 30, 2012
Henry Kissinger -
Hermann Goering -
Sunday, July 15, 2012
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn -
Monday, July 02, 2012
Frederic Bastiat -
Monday, May 28, 2012
Benjamin Disreali -
Wednesday, March 14, 2012
Eric Hoffer -
Monday, March 12, 2012
Frederick Douglass -
Sunday, December 11, 2011
Tom Kratman -
Other factors in the fall of civilizations concern separation of the elites and denial by those elites of goods and services required or desired by the larger, non-elite portion of the civilization. The separation is not merely physical, though it is usually that, too. As important, the separation becomes one of lack of accountability of the elites to the masses.
Consider who typically forms the elite: Unelected judges, politicians often gerrymandered into lifetime seats, hidden—hence safe—bureaucrats, unpoliced journalists with agendas that bear no particular correlation to advancing the truth, hereditary aristocrats, the denationalized and greedy rich, self-appointed activists, entertainers judged alone on their ability to make the unreal seem real, etc. None of these are truly accountable to those over whom they exercise power and influence .
Take it as a given throughout human history: lack of accountability leads, invariably, to irresponsibility. Irresponsibility in those who wield power, be they elites or—in the rare genuine democracy—the masses, is disaster.
Tuesday, November 08, 2011
Adam Smith -
Sunday, October 02, 2011
John Dewey -
Tuesday, July 12, 2011
Abraham Lincoln -
Thursday, June 23, 2011
Dr. Lyle H. Rossiter -
Monday, June 20, 2011
James Delingpole -
Friday, May 13, 2011
Wednesday, April 20, 2011
Ayn Rand -
At a sales conference at Random House, preceding the publication of Atlas Shrugged, one of the book salesmen asked me whether I could present the essence of my philosophy while standing on one foot. I did as follows:
Metaphysics: Objective Reality
Epistemology: Reason
Ethics: Self-interest
Politics: Capitalism
If you want this translated into simple language, it would read: 1. “Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed” or “Wishing won’t make it so.” 2. “You can’t eat your cake and have it, too.” 3. “Man is an end in himself.” 4. “Give me liberty or give me death.”
If you held these concepts with total consistency, as the base of your convictions, you would have a full philosophical system to guide the course of your life. But to hold them with total consistency—to understand, to define, to prove and to apply them—requires volumes of thought. Which is why philosophy cannot be discussed while standing on one foot—nor while standing on two feet on both sides of every fence. This last is the predominant philosophical position today, particularly in the field of politics.
My philosophy, Objectivism, holds that:
Reality exists as an objective absolute—facts are facts, independent of man’s feelings, wishes, hopes or fears.
Reason (the faculty which identifies and integrates the material provided by man’s senses) is man’s only means of perceiving reality, his only source of knowledge, his only guide to action, and his basic means of survival.
Man—every man—is an end in himself, not the means to the ends of others. He must exist for his own sake, neither sacrificing himself to others nor sacrificing others to himself. The pursuit of his own rational self-interest and of his own happiness is the highest moral purpose of his life.
The ideal political-economic system is laissez-faire capitalism. It is a system where men deal with one another, not as victims and executioners, nor as masters and slaves, but as traders, by free, voluntary exchange to mutual benefit. It is a system where no man may obtain any values from others by resorting to physical force, and no man may initiate the use of physical force against others. The government acts only as a policeman that protects man’s rights; it uses physical force only in retaliation and only against those who initiate its use, such as criminals or foreign invaders. In a system of full capitalism, there should be (but, historically, has not yet been) a complete separation of state and economics, in the same way and for the same reasons as the separation of state and church.Wednesday, March 09, 2011
Ted Kaczynski -
On freedom: Freedom means having power; not the power to control other people but the power to control the circumstances of one's own life. One does not have freedom if anyone else (especially a large organization) has power over one, no matter how benevolently, tolerantly and permissively that power may be exercised.
Saturday, January 01, 2011
Terry Pratchett -
Fear is strange soil. Mainly it grows obedience like corn, which grows in rows and makes weeding easy. But sometimes it grows the potatoes of defiance, which flourish underground.
Saturday, December 18, 2010
Thursday, November 25, 2010
Stephen Leacock -
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
Václav Klaus -
Saturday, October 09, 2010
In their own words -
- Amory Lovins, Rocky Mountain Institute
“The prospect of cheap fusion energy is the worst thing that could happen to the planet.”
- Jeremy Rifkin, Greenhouse Crisis Foundation
“Giving society cheap, abundant energy would be the equivalent of giving an idiot child a machine gun.”
- Prof Paul Ehrlich, Stanford University
“Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsiblity to bring that about?”
- Maurice Strong, founder of the UN Environment Programme
“The only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another United States. We can’t let other countries have the same number of cars, the amount of industrialization, we have in the US. We have to stop these Third World countries right where they are.”
- Michael Oppenheimer, Environmental Defense Fund
“Global Sustainability requires the deliberate quest of poverty, reduced resource consumption and set levels of mortality control.”
- Professor Maurice King
“My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100 million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see wilderness, with it’s full complement of species, returning throughout the world.”
-Dave Foreman, co-founder of Earth First!
Thursday, September 02, 2010
Sunday, August 29, 2010
Jeff Goldstein -
For the progressive agenda to ascend, the ideals of classical liberalism — those concerning individual autonomy, natural rights, Enlightenment notions of truth and the foregrounding of logic over rhetoric as a bulwark against the will to power — need to be deconstructed and then de-legitimized. Identity politics must replace individual autonomy, with the various factions within identity groups vying for what will become that group’s sanctioned narrative (with the losers in that battle cast out as inauthentic, or race-traitors, or sufferers of false consciousness, etc.); natural rights need be “separated” from the secular rights that are then decided upon by the ruling class; truth must always be “contingent,” subject to perspective and narrative frame for its relative rhetorical power, and never absolute; interpretation becomes such that the message of an individual becomes the property of an “interpretive community” whose own intentions then take precedence over the intentions of the individual — and are allowed moreover to determine the intentions of that individual.
To beat back the progressive agenda is to beat back the kernel assumptions of leftism itself — to reaffirm the very principles upon which this country was founded, and which the left has been steadily hoping to erode through an institutional takeover of language, be the offshoot of such a linguistic coup the idea of a “living Constitution” or identity politics as reinforced by such benign terms as “diversity” and “multiculturalism.
Friday, April 30, 2010
Machiavelli, The Prince -
Sunday, March 14, 2010
Jonah Goldberg -
Saturday, March 13, 2010
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
P.J. O'Rourke -
“The man of system [...] is apt to be very wise in his own conceit; and is often so enamoured with the supposed beauty of his own ideal plan of government, that he cannot suffer the smallest deviation from any part of it.[...] He seems to imagine that he can arrange the different members of a great society with as much ease as the hand arranges the different pieces upon a chess-board.”
Barbed wire always seems to be needed to keep the chessmen on their squares.
Tuesday, March 09, 2010
Friday, March 05, 2010
Adolph Hitler -
Karl Marx -
Wednesday, March 03, 2010
Dr. Zero -
The Western nations which have abandoned this essential understanding of an individual’s right to self-defense have become rotting orphanages filled with dependent children. They’re not dealing very well with the invasion of a determined ideology that has complete confidence in its own righteousness, and few reservations about using violence to assert itself. Losing the dignity of self-defense is part of the degeneration from master of the State to its client.
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
Murray Rothbard -
"Of course, one method of securing support is through the creation of vested economic interests. ...[T]his ... secures only a minority of eager supporters, and even the essential purchasing of support by subsidies and other grants of privilege still does not obtain the consent of the majority. For this essential acceptance, the majority must be persuaded by ideology that their government is good, wise and, at least, inevitable, and certainly better than other conceivable alternatives. Promoting this ideology among the people is the vital social task of the 'intellectuals.' For the masses of men do not create their own ideas, or indeed think through these ideas independently; they follow passively the ideas adopted and disseminated by the body of intellectuals. The intellectuals are, therefore, the 'opinion-molders' in society. And since it is precisely a molding of opinion that the State most desperately needs, the basis for [the] age-old alliance between the State and the intellectuals becomes clear."
Sunday, January 24, 2010
C.S. Lewis -
Saturday, January 09, 2010
Jeff Goldstein -
The fact is, the people who make up these activist identity groups need their “isms.” And because fighting a particular “ism” is what gives them their identity to begin with, they cannot allow the “ism” ever to be stamped out without, in effect, obviating their own identities.
Monday, December 21, 2009
Friday, December 04, 2009
Winston Churchill -
Thursday, November 05, 2009
Ayn Rand -
Sunday, November 01, 2009
Wretchard -
Judge Alex Kozinski -
Tuesday, August 25, 2009
Alexander Hamilton -
Saturday, August 15, 2009
Alexander Solzhenitsyn -
Sunday, June 14, 2009
Alan Charles Kor -
Wednesday, June 03, 2009
Friday, May 22, 2009
Disraeli -
Monday, May 11, 2009
John Derbyshire -
Friday, May 08, 2009
Aldous Huxley -
Monday, May 04, 2009
Orwell on Doublethink -
Sunday, May 03, 2009
Catharine A. MacKinnon -
Wednesday, April 08, 2009
Tom Paine -
Wednesday, April 01, 2009
Ayn Rand -
Friday, March 27, 2009
Marcus Aurelius -
Thursday, March 19, 2009
F.A.Hayek -
Thursday, March 05, 2009
Robert Heinlein -
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
Edmund Burke -
Wednesday, November 05, 2008
H.L. Mencken -
Tuesday, June 03, 2008
Donald Sensing -
Monday, March 24, 2008
Guy Herbert -
Tuesday, March 04, 2008
John Adams -
Thursday, January 31, 2008
Samuel Adams -
Friday, January 25, 2008
Roger de Hauteville -
Friday, December 28, 2007
Rabbi Jonathan Sacks -
Wednesday, December 26, 2007
Winston Churchill -
Tuesday, December 11, 2007
Alexis de Tocqueville -
Thursday, November 29, 2007
Evan Coyne Maloney -
Monday, October 15, 2007
Doris Lessing -
Wilfrid Laurier -
Wednesday, August 15, 2007
Benito Mussolini -
Thursday, June 14, 2007
John Brignell -
Tuesday, May 29, 2007
Thomas Sowell -
Ours may become the first civilization destroyed, not by the power of our enemies, but by the ignorance of our teachers and the dangerous nonsense they are teaching our children. In an age of artificial intelligence, they are creating artificial stupidity.
Saturday, May 26, 2007
Fjordman, again -
Monday, May 21, 2007
Fjordman -
Monday, May 14, 2007
Galileo -
Tuesday, May 08, 2007
Thursday, April 26, 2007
Michael Crichton -
Wednesday, April 25, 2007
Andrew Klavan -
This is leftism’s great strength: it’s all white lies. That’s its only advantage, as far as I can tell. None of its programs actually works, after all. From statism and income redistribution to liberalized criminal laws and multiculturalism, from its assault on religion to its redefinition of family, leftist policies have made the common life worse wherever they’re installed. But because it depends on—indeed is defined by—describing the human condition inaccurately, leftism is nothing if not polite...
Friday, April 06, 2007
Karl Popper -
Saturday, March 17, 2007
Claire Berlinski -
When in doubt about the proper orientation of your moral compass, point it away from the people who want to behead you.


Any “scientific” claim made without willingness to share every scrap of data, every technique, and every last line of code used to reach the conclusion, is not science. At best it is simply flawed, because real science requires independent repeatability of experiments. At worst, it is not even wrong but actively fraudulent.
If the Warmistas were actually scientists, they would welcome skeptical, even hostile, review of their work. They would welcome it when any real flaws were found in their methodology. Since they do not, they are not scientists. They are highly credentialed Ruling Class fraudsters, betrayers of real science and of real scientists whose mannerisms they ape but whose shoes they are not fit to shine. They deserve no more consideration from anyone with a functioning cerebrum than do the folks selling “miracle” weight loss pills on TV at 2AM. In a world unlike ours, i.e. one not dominated by insane legal and social kabuki so convoluted it would stun medieval Byzantine patriarchs at three hundred paces, they would be in jail for fraud.