When you remember that “woke” is a synonym for “crazy, stupid, and vicious” it all makes sense.
Sunday, April 11, 2021
Saturday, February 13, 2021
Marcus Aurelius -
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in ranks of the insane.
Tuesday, February 02, 2021
Herbert Marcuse -
Movements from the left must be extended tolerance, even when they are violent, while movements from the right must not be tolerated, including suppressing them by violence.
Thursday, January 28, 2021
Mark Steyn -
Yesterday's mental illness is today's social policy.
Diversity is where societies go to die.
Thursday, December 03, 2020
Aristotle -
Masculine republics give way to feminine democracies, and feminine democracies give way to tyranny.
Wednesday, October 21, 2020
Kevin Baker -
If Right-wing extremists were as dangerous as they think, there wouldn't BE any Left-wing extremists.
Monday, September 14, 2020
Thomas Sowell -
Activism is a way for useless people to feel important, even if the consequences of their activism are counterproductive for those they claim to be helping and damaging to the fabric of society as a whole.
Sunday, September 13, 2020
Edward Bernays -
No serious sociologist any longer believes that the
voice of the people expresses any divine or specially wise and lofty
idea. The voice of the people expresses the mind of the people, and that
mind is made up for it by the group leaders in whom it believes and by
those persons who understand the manipulation of public opinion. It is
composed of inherited prejudices and symbols and clichés and verbal
formulas supplied to them by the leaders.
Saturday, July 25, 2020
Glenn Reynolds -
Monday, March 02, 2020
Freeman Dyson -
Thursday, February 20, 2020
Robert Heinlein -
What are the facts? Again and again and again – what are the facts? Shun wishful thinking, ignore divine revelation, forget what “the stars foretell,” avoid opinion, care not what the neighbors think, never mind the unguessable “verdict of history” – what are the facts, and to how many decimal places? You pilot always into an unknown future; facts are your single clue. Get the facts!
Saturday, February 01, 2020
Joseph Goebbels -
Monday, December 02, 2019
Arthur Schopenhauer -
Wednesday, November 13, 2019
Donald Rumsfeld -
Thursday, November 07, 2019
Frederick Douglass -
Tuesday, November 05, 2019
Benito Mussolini -
Tuesday, October 29, 2019
Karl Popper -
Tuesday, August 06, 2019
George Orwell -
Saturday, June 15, 2019
Thursday, June 13, 2019
George Orwell -
The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became the truth.
In a time of universal deceit – telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
Friday, May 31, 2019
Neil Gorsuch -
Thursday, May 23, 2019
Paul Johnson -
Sunday, May 12, 2019
Moe Lane -
Sunday, April 28, 2019
Milan Kundera -
The first step in liquidating a people is to erase its memory. Destroy its books, its culture, its history. Then have somebody write new books, manufacture a new culture, invent a new history. Before long that nation will begin to forget what it is and what it was. The world around it will forget even faster.
Sunday, March 31, 2019
Frederic Bastiat -
"When law and force keep a person within the bounds of justice, they…oblige him only to abstain from harming others. They violate neither his personality, his liberty, nor his property. They safeguard all of these. They are defensive; they defend equally the rights of all."
"But when the law, by means of its necessary agent, force, imposes upon men…the law is no longer negative…It substitutes the will of the legislator for their own wills...they lose their personality, their liberty, their property."
"As it takes from some persons and gives to other persons…the law…is an instrument of plunder."
Wednesday, February 27, 2019
Jeff Snyder -
Monday, December 03, 2018
Marcus Tullius Cicero -
Thursday, August 09, 2018
Rickover and the Nuclear Navy: The Discipline of Technology -
Sunday, July 01, 2018
Glenn Reynolds -
Friday, May 18, 2018
Vladimir Ilyich Lenin -
Thursday, March 08, 2018
Napoleon Bonaparte -
Thursday, February 22, 2018
Thomas Sowell -
Thursday, February 01, 2018
Tuesday, December 19, 2017
Monday, December 11, 2017
Friday, November 10, 2017
Glenn Reynolds -
Tuesday, November 07, 2017
Richard P. Feynman -
Tuesday, September 12, 2017
Issac Newton -
Monday, August 14, 2017
Sun Tzu -
Friday, July 07, 2017
Alexander Solzhenitsyn -
Wednesday, December 28, 2016
Thomas Sowell -
Tuesday, July 12, 2016
Eric Hoffer -
Friday, April 22, 2016
Don Surber -
Wednesday, January 27, 2016
Friday, January 22, 2016
Edward Gibbon, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire -
Wednesday, January 13, 2016
Horace -
“They change their sky, not their souls, who cross the sea.”
Wednesday, January 06, 2016
Tuesday, October 13, 2015
-
Sunday, September 06, 2015
William Blake -
Wednesday, August 12, 2015
Sarah Hoyt -
Wednesday, July 29, 2015
Mark Twain -
Friday, June 05, 2015
Monday, May 04, 2015
-
Sunday, April 19, 2015
Martin Luther King, Jr -
Monday, February 09, 2015
William F. Buckley, Jr -
Tuesday, January 27, 2015
Winston Churchill -
Thursday, October 09, 2014
Thursday, June 12, 2014
Confucius, Analects XIII:III:4 -
Sunday, April 27, 2014
Booker T. Washington -
Having learned that they are able to make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs — partly because they want sympathy and partly because it pays. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs.... as the disease holds out they have not only an easy means of making a living, but also an easy medium through which to make themselves prominent before the public.
Friday, July 19, 2013
Ayn Rand -
1. In any conflict between two men (or two groups) who hold the same basic principles, it is the more consistent one who wins.
2. In any collaboration between two men (or two groups) who hold different basic principles, it is the more evil or irrational one who wins.
3. When opposite basic principles are clearly and openly defined, it works to the advantage of the rational side; when they are not clearly defined, but are hidden or evaded, it works to the advantage of the irrational side.
Monday, July 15, 2013
Wednesday, March 13, 2013
Tom Kratman -
1. If you believe that general intelligence exists, is heritable and at all testable for, you’re a racist.
2. If you point out that liberal philosophies and programs intended to have a good impact have had a disproportionately bad impact on the ethnicities targeted by liberals, you’re a racist.
3. If you notice that other cultures have some problems, you’re a racist.
4. If you notice your own culture has had some successes, you’re a racist.
5. If you try to identify subcultural problems, you’re a racist. If the problems existed or got worse under liberalism, see item 2, above.
6. If you’re mainstream American culture, and don’t hate that culture, you’re a racist.
7. If you’re capable of noting unpleasant facts about subcultures and discussing them without your brain fogging, you’re a racist.
8. If you won’t kowtow and grovel as soon as someone accuses you of racism for one of the reasons above or below, you’re a hopeless racist.
9. If you do not believe that mankind is a tabula rasa for liberals to make whatever they think would be good to make of man, this week, you’re a racist.
10. If you don’t take personal responsibility for all the evils of slavery, you’re a racist. This is true even if you only arrived from Poland last week.
11. If you’re white, you’re a racist.
12. If you’re white and just arrived from Poland last week and don’t accept that you’re a racist, you’re a racist.
13. If you try to interject logical thought into a discussion of culture, you’re a racist.
14. If you refuse to admit culture is a racial matter, and a liberal wants to conflate the two, you’re a racist.
15. If you believe that race and culture are indistinguishable and a liberal decides that you shouldn’t conflate the two, you’re a racist.
16. If you believe that black or Hispanic girls who are paid by liberal inspired programs from the age of 13 to have babies will have babies, you’re a racist.
17. If you believe that _any_ girls of whatever color who are paid to have babies will then have babies but then, insensitively, observe that a smaller percentage of white girls do, certainly because they haven’t been targeted for as much “help” from liberals, you’re a racist.
18. If it doesn’t bother you that the truth offends liberals, you’re a racist.
19. If your name is Tom Kratman and you write and in your writing your heroes and heroines tend to be from minorities while your villains are white liberals, you’re still a racist.
20. If you read The Bell Curve, you’re a racist. On the other hand, if you didn’t read it but wrote a scathing review on Amazon anyway you might not be a racist provided you take personal responsibility for 300 years of slavery even if you just arrived from Poland last week.
Saturday, February 02, 2013
Thursday, October 04, 2012
T.S. Eliot -
Sunday, September 30, 2012
Henry Kissinger -
Hermann Goering -
Sunday, July 15, 2012
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn -
Monday, July 02, 2012
Frederic Bastiat -
Monday, May 28, 2012
Benjamin Disreali -
Wednesday, March 14, 2012
Eric Hoffer -
Monday, March 12, 2012
Frederick Douglass -
Sunday, December 11, 2011
Tom Kratman -
Other factors in the fall of civilizations concern separation of the elites and denial by those elites of goods and services required or desired by the larger, non-elite portion of the civilization. The separation is not merely physical, though it is usually that, too. As important, the separation becomes one of lack of accountability of the elites to the masses.
Consider who typically forms the elite: Unelected judges, politicians often gerrymandered into lifetime seats, hidden—hence safe—bureaucrats, unpoliced journalists with agendas that bear no particular correlation to advancing the truth, hereditary aristocrats, the denationalized and greedy rich, self-appointed activists, entertainers judged alone on their ability to make the unreal seem real, etc. None of these are truly accountable to those over whom they exercise power and influence .
Take it as a given throughout human history: lack of accountability leads, invariably, to irresponsibility. Irresponsibility in those who wield power, be they elites or—in the rare genuine democracy—the masses, is disaster.
Tuesday, November 08, 2011
Adam Smith -
Sunday, October 02, 2011
John Dewey -
Tuesday, July 12, 2011
Abraham Lincoln -
Thursday, June 23, 2011
Dr. Lyle H. Rossiter -
Monday, June 20, 2011
James Delingpole -
Friday, May 13, 2011
Wednesday, April 20, 2011
Ayn Rand -
At a sales conference at Random House, preceding the publication of Atlas Shrugged, one of the book salesmen asked me whether I could present the essence of my philosophy while standing on one foot. I did as follows:
Metaphysics: Objective Reality
Epistemology: Reason
Ethics: Self-interest
Politics: Capitalism
If you want this translated into simple language, it would read: 1. “Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed” or “Wishing won’t make it so.” 2. “You can’t eat your cake and have it, too.” 3. “Man is an end in himself.” 4. “Give me liberty or give me death.”
If you held these concepts with total consistency, as the base of your convictions, you would have a full philosophical system to guide the course of your life. But to hold them with total consistency—to understand, to define, to prove and to apply them—requires volumes of thought. Which is why philosophy cannot be discussed while standing on one foot—nor while standing on two feet on both sides of every fence. This last is the predominant philosophical position today, particularly in the field of politics.
My philosophy, Objectivism, holds that:
Reality exists as an objective absolute—facts are facts, independent of man’s feelings, wishes, hopes or fears.
Reason (the faculty which identifies and integrates the material provided by man’s senses) is man’s only means of perceiving reality, his only source of knowledge, his only guide to action, and his basic means of survival.
Man—every man—is an end in himself, not the means to the ends of others. He must exist for his own sake, neither sacrificing himself to others nor sacrificing others to himself. The pursuit of his own rational self-interest and of his own happiness is the highest moral purpose of his life.
The ideal political-economic system is laissez-faire capitalism. It is a system where men deal with one another, not as victims and executioners, nor as masters and slaves, but as traders, by free, voluntary exchange to mutual benefit. It is a system where no man may obtain any values from others by resorting to physical force, and no man may initiate the use of physical force against others. The government acts only as a policeman that protects man’s rights; it uses physical force only in retaliation and only against those who initiate its use, such as criminals or foreign invaders. In a system of full capitalism, there should be (but, historically, has not yet been) a complete separation of state and economics, in the same way and for the same reasons as the separation of state and church.Wednesday, March 09, 2011
Ted Kaczynski -
On freedom: Freedom means having power; not the power to control other people but the power to control the circumstances of one's own life. One does not have freedom if anyone else (especially a large organization) has power over one, no matter how benevolently, tolerantly and permissively that power may be exercised.
Saturday, January 01, 2011
Terry Pratchett -
Fear is strange soil. Mainly it grows obedience like corn, which grows in rows and makes weeding easy. But sometimes it grows the potatoes of defiance, which flourish underground.
Saturday, December 18, 2010
Thursday, November 25, 2010
Stephen Leacock -
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
Václav Klaus -
Saturday, October 09, 2010
In their own words -
- Amory Lovins, Rocky Mountain Institute
“The prospect of cheap fusion energy is the worst thing that could happen to the planet.”
- Jeremy Rifkin, Greenhouse Crisis Foundation
“Giving society cheap, abundant energy would be the equivalent of giving an idiot child a machine gun.”
- Prof Paul Ehrlich, Stanford University
“Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsiblity to bring that about?”
- Maurice Strong, founder of the UN Environment Programme
“The only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another United States. We can’t let other countries have the same number of cars, the amount of industrialization, we have in the US. We have to stop these Third World countries right where they are.”
- Michael Oppenheimer, Environmental Defense Fund
“Global Sustainability requires the deliberate quest of poverty, reduced resource consumption and set levels of mortality control.”
- Professor Maurice King
“My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100 million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see wilderness, with it’s full complement of species, returning throughout the world.”
-Dave Foreman, co-founder of Earth First!
Thursday, September 02, 2010
Sunday, August 29, 2010
Jeff Goldstein -
For the progressive agenda to ascend, the ideals of classical liberalism — those concerning individual autonomy, natural rights, Enlightenment notions of truth and the foregrounding of logic over rhetoric as a bulwark against the will to power — need to be deconstructed and then de-legitimized. Identity politics must replace individual autonomy, with the various factions within identity groups vying for what will become that group’s sanctioned narrative (with the losers in that battle cast out as inauthentic, or race-traitors, or sufferers of false consciousness, etc.); natural rights need be “separated” from the secular rights that are then decided upon by the ruling class; truth must always be “contingent,” subject to perspective and narrative frame for its relative rhetorical power, and never absolute; interpretation becomes such that the message of an individual becomes the property of an “interpretive community” whose own intentions then take precedence over the intentions of the individual — and are allowed moreover to determine the intentions of that individual.
To beat back the progressive agenda is to beat back the kernel assumptions of leftism itself — to reaffirm the very principles upon which this country was founded, and which the left has been steadily hoping to erode through an institutional takeover of language, be the offshoot of such a linguistic coup the idea of a “living Constitution” or identity politics as reinforced by such benign terms as “diversity” and “multiculturalism.
Friday, April 30, 2010
Machiavelli, The Prince -
Sunday, March 14, 2010
Jonah Goldberg -

Saturday, March 13, 2010
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
P.J. O'Rourke -
“The man of system [...] is apt to be very wise in his own conceit; and is often so enamoured with the supposed beauty of his own ideal plan of government, that he cannot suffer the smallest deviation from any part of it.[...] He seems to imagine that he can arrange the different members of a great society with as much ease as the hand arranges the different pieces upon a chess-board.”
Barbed wire always seems to be needed to keep the chessmen on their squares.

Tuesday, March 09, 2010
Friday, March 05, 2010
Adolph Hitler -

Karl Marx -

Wednesday, March 03, 2010
Dr. Zero -
The Western nations which have abandoned this essential understanding of an individual’s right to self-defense have become rotting orphanages filled with dependent children. They’re not dealing very well with the invasion of a determined ideology that has complete confidence in its own righteousness, and few reservations about using violence to assert itself. Losing the dignity of self-defense is part of the degeneration from master of the State to its client.

Wednesday, February 17, 2010
Murray Rothbard -
"Of course, one method of securing support is through the creation of vested economic interests. ...[T]his ... secures only a minority of eager supporters, and even the essential purchasing of support by subsidies and other grants of privilege still does not obtain the consent of the majority. For this essential acceptance, the majority must be persuaded by ideology that their government is good, wise and, at least, inevitable, and certainly better than other conceivable alternatives. Promoting this ideology among the people is the vital social task of the 'intellectuals.' For the masses of men do not create their own ideas, or indeed think through these ideas independently; they follow passively the ideas adopted and disseminated by the body of intellectuals. The intellectuals are, therefore, the 'opinion-molders' in society. And since it is precisely a molding of opinion that the State most desperately needs, the basis for [the] age-old alliance between the State and the intellectuals becomes clear."

Sunday, January 24, 2010
C.S. Lewis -

Saturday, January 09, 2010
Jeff Goldstein -
The fact is, the people who make up these activist identity groups need their “isms.” And because fighting a particular “ism” is what gives them their identity to begin with, they cannot allow the “ism” ever to be stamped out without, in effect, obviating their own identities.

Any “scientific” claim made without willingness to share every scrap of data, every technique, and every last line of code used to reach the conclusion, is not science. At best it is simply flawed, because real science requires independent repeatability of experiments. At worst, it is not even wrong but actively fraudulent.
If the Warmistas were actually scientists, they would welcome skeptical, even hostile, review of their work. They would welcome it when any real flaws were found in their methodology. Since they do not, they are not scientists. They are highly credentialed Ruling Class fraudsters, betrayers of real science and of real scientists whose mannerisms they ape but whose shoes they are not fit to shine. They deserve no more consideration from anyone with a functioning cerebrum than do the folks selling “miracle” weight loss pills on TV at 2AM. In a world unlike ours, i.e. one not dominated by insane legal and social kabuki so convoluted it would stun medieval Byzantine patriarchs at three hundred paces, they would be in jail for fraud.